Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 860 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Public Sector Management Component Activation Issue

October 22, 2015, 5:35 am
$
0
0

Hi experts;

     I need to activate the PSM for the purpose of Fund Management to recruit the Budget.

 

I followed threads on the forum and they are very helpful, they guided me almost to each step supported with t-code to do such task but at the point to activation for the IS-PS from BF11 in order to later active the ES-PS from SWF5.

 

That as far I understood and made, then at time of activation of the IS-PS from BF11 the Activation CHECK BOX was deemed and not able to tic it to activate the component however else components are subject for activation and the screen is set on the CHANGE mode not DISPLAY.

 

So can someone kindly guide how to do that please?

 

Thanks in advance;

 

Best regards;

 

Ahmad Mahmud;

↧
Search

Short dump on FB60 and F-02 Program "RFMATGRDES1000001 " not found.

October 26, 2015, 5:06 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

I have finished the customizing activities for FM- BCS, the derivation rules are ok but when I try to post a consumable budget document, I´m getting a short dump "Program "RFMATGRDES1000001 " not found."

I have read related posts indicating that the derivation rules might be wrong, so I activated the trace and they didn´t poped up any message. Please help me...

 

Thank´s in advance.

↧
↧

Unable to make any changes to WBS element after activation of Fund Management

October 27, 2015, 1:45 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

Recently we have activated Fund Management, If we are trying to make changes to network activity or WBS element system is throwing error as

"Error in commitment check (see costing log) Message No. CO634"  and when tried to check the logs there are no further details displayed and no error message number.

 

Can anyone help us to resolve this issue

↧

New FM area not available for configuration

October 27, 2015, 6:38 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

I am facing two unexpected behaviors from FM configuration and I would like to check with you, experienced professional, whether it is ok and possible solutions, Any help or advice would be really appreciated.

 

My customer requirement is to manage the budget as year basis. After creating a new FM área, named ORCA, as assigned it to the company code I am trying to complete these configuration steps without success.

 

  1. Public Sector Management => Fund Management Government => Basic Settings => Activate Multi-Year Budget Execution.

 

Activate Multi-Year Budget.png

 

I understand there is no configuration required here as customer needs to manage budget year dependent. By my point is: why the new FM área ORCA does not show up? Is it OK? Missing FM área at this point would cause inconsistences in the future?

 

 

     2. (T-CODE FMSG) - Public Sector Management => Funds Management Government => Master Data => Account Assignment Elements => Funds Center => Hierarchy Variant => Assign Hierarchy Variant to FM Area

 

Assign Fund Center Hierarchy.png

 

On the other hand we would like to work with year independent fund center máster data. As per SAP documentation, I can have hierarchy defined through the years by putting blank in fiscal year. Please, note the shotscreen above, fiscal year is required. I have tried to inform fiscal year 0000 and got the message F6508 "Hierarchy variant 000 is incomplete with regard to fiscal year 0000".

 

Just for record, Year-dependent máster data is not activated.

 

Master data year dependancy.png

 

Thanks in advance for your attencion.

 

Kind regards,

 

Adriana

↧

FICUSTOM169 Error when reversing a Material Document

October 27, 2015, 1:06 pm
$
0
0

Hi all.

 

We have created a Material Document with movement type 552. Now we want to reverse that document using MBST transaction.

 

Original document is from 10 days ago.

 

When we are trying to save the reversed doc, error message FICUSTOM169 is shown: 'Carryforward level cannot be transferred from invoice reference'

 

Which is weird since no invoices are involved whatsoever.

 

We recently applied several Support Packages, now our SP Level is 16 (SAP 6.04). Prior to this update we neve had any problems.

 

 

Here is my OFUP customization:

ofuppng.png

 

Any ideas?.

Thanks and regards, Mauro.

↧
↧

Activation of IS-PS Issue

October 28, 2015, 4:01 am
$
0
0

Hi experts;

     I have started PSM Fund Management components activation few days ago.

After search and with the help of our expert colleagues on SCN I managed to let Public Sector appear under both IMG as well easy menu.

through the following:

 

Activated three BC set

   a. EA-PS-AKH

   b. EA-PS-IMG

   c. EA-PS-MENU

through T-code SCPR20

 

And on the SFW5 mentioned in front of the EA-PS Business Function will remain switched on

And press the Activate Changes button and gives message that it is running in background and later I find n o changes however I found that it is worked with another colleague on the Forum as mentioned here   Funds Management Activation 

 

And accordingly the IS-PS is yet inactive and its field is set on display mode on the BF11 or FIBF.

 

Main problem now is to manage to activate the IS-PS.

 

So may someone kindly advice and help how to solve such issue?

 

Thanks in advance;

 

Kind regards;

 

Ahmad Mahmud;

↧

Message FMAVC005 FMAV008

October 28, 2015, 11:32 am
$
0
0

Hi everyone. The following problems have occured for the first time:

 

1) I post a PO, post downpayment referencing this PO (F-43), post invoice with MIRO. When I want to reverse the invoice with MR8M I get message no. FMAVC008. Customizing of automatic clearing of downpayment seems to be OK

 

2) I post a PO, post downpayment referencing this PO (F-43). When I try to post the invoice with tcode MIRO I get the error messa FMAVC005. Again, I believe the customizing point "Configure automatic clearing of down payments/down payment requests" is OK

 

I still have not been able to solve it. If you have any clue about this I would appreciate it. Thanks!

 

Gonzalo

↧

Budgeting at a lower level than Sponsored Class in GM?

October 29, 2015, 8:29 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are facing a requirement to budget at a lower level than Sponsored Classes. Does anybody face a similar requirement? IS anybody using Internal Orders with GM?

 

Thanks!

Mariela

↧
Search

Unable to Clarify (Re-Post) Payment lot for a new BP and CA

November 4, 2015, 2:18 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I have a scenario in SAP PSCD module when a payment lot has already been posted to a Business Partner and Contract Account. Our requirement is, same payment lot needs to be re-post for a new Business Partner and Contract Account through a report program. To achieve this I am able to reset-clear the current payment document using the function module FKK_RESET_CLEARING and reversing the payment by calling the function module FKK_REVERSE_DOC. But I am not able to clarify and post this payment lot for new Business Partner and Contract Account through my program. I have tried with following function modules but could not solve the purpose.

 

  • FKK_PAYMENT_BATCH_POST – Giving dump when calling from report program with Payment lot, new BP and CA
  • FKK_PAYMENT_BATCH_CLARIFY_ITEM – Opening a screen for user input, when calling form report program.

 

Can anyone have any idea how to clarify a payment lot by changing the BP and CA through report program?   

↧
↧

Year End Carryforward issue

November 6, 2015, 3:50 am
$
0
0

Hi,

We have implemented BCS ( Fund Management ) at our end and during testing we came across following scenario for which seeking solution.

We have put budget of Rs 100000 in fund center FC1 and Commitment Item CI1 combination in FY 2014. We have raised PO against these combination of Rs. 60000.Fund management report for these FC1 and CI1 combination for FY 2014 now see as

 

                                                       Consumable           Consumed          Available

FC1

               CI1                                       100000                   60000                  40000

When we do carry forward for the same using t-code FMJ2, the same commitment and budget flew to next FY 2015. Now the same report read for FY 2014 and FY 2015 as

 

FY 2014

                                                      Consumable            Consumed          Available

FC1

             CI1                                           NIL                          NIL                    NIL

 

FY 2015

                                                       Consumable          Consumed           Available

FC1

              CI1                                      100000                    60000                  40000

Now in FY 2015, I am deleting line items from PO, the same report now read as

FY 2015

                                                       Consumable           Consumed         Available

FC1

          CI1                                           100000                    0                       100000

Ideally when I am deleting line item from PO, the commitment should disappear and the requirement is to have available budget of Rs. 40000 in FY 2015. The Report should read like

FY 2015                        

                                                       Consumable            Consumed      Available

FI1

          CI1                                            100000                    0                    40000

Which is not happening in current environment ...Are we missing on some config??/

Kindly guide us.

 

 

Thanks

Parag

↧

Field USERDIM in funds management

November 11, 2015, 11:19 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

There is no documentation on how to use the field USERDIM in funds management. Kindly explain how this field is used and in what scenarios. The information I have is it is available for users but it is certainly not in used in SAP. I take it that it should only be used as an enhancement.

 

Regards

Jordan

↧

Sales Reversal Impact in Funds Management

November 11, 2015, 10:41 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

I have a scenario of sales return and its impact in Funds Management. Lets say i have a total budget of 10,000 for sales. I record a sale or 8,000 today which in Funds Management will show m consumption of 8,000. Now there is a sale return of 1,000. When i post this return system will revert back consumption of 1000 and now total consumption of budget will be 7,000 which is fine in case where sale is recorded and returned on the same Funds Management assignments. We have divided our fund on the basis of months like OPEX-JAN, OPEX-FEB etc. Now fund is derived based on the posting date and budget impacts are posted accordingly. Lets say i recorded a sales of 8000 on the last day of Jan and in Funds Management it was updated against Fund REV-JAN. Next day sales of 1000 was returned. Now posting this return will derive fund of REV-FEB and now system throws me an error that budget is over consumed. this is because there is no consumption posted in REV-FEB from which this 1000 is to be reversed. The actual consumption was in REV-JAN and this should be reversed from the same. But this is not the case here we record sale reversals in the date it was reversed as we close our receivables on daily basis. Can any one help me out here how can i handle this in SAP.

 

Regards,

↧

Fund Center Issue in Purchase Order

November 11, 2015, 11:51 pm
$
0
0

Dear Expert

 

 

My issue is related to Integration between MM and FM.

 

 

My PO is created with Valuated material. As a standard process when any material is received (GRN) free of cost from the vendors, since field UMSON is ticked, then as a standard behavior, system should make this material as non valuated with no accounting impact. But in my case, system is asking for Fund Center.. Why?

 

 

Please advise the correction.

 

 

Thanks

Syed Zia Abbas

↧
↧

Copy a budget version

November 19, 2015, 4:00 pm
$
0
0

Hi guys,

Could help me I do know how to copy a budget version to another? When I do the Tx FM9B the system throws me a message that the version does not exist; but if any.

 

Thanks in advance.

↧

Budget Query

November 19, 2015, 7:37 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have created a PO for 10000 and hence the budget consumed shows correctly as 10k. But when we crate a DPR for 5000, the amount gets reduced from consumed figures by that amount.This creates an anamoly because the budget amount is again available for new commitment.

This is creating a substantial confusion in the process for funds management.

 

Regards

↧
Search

FM activation Issue

November 20, 2015, 8:57 pm
$
0
0

Hi expert,

 

We have activated FM and there were no error as such of ledger not available. Since the table T881 was already with leading ledger as F1 but for financial component was with leading ledger 0L.

 

Since we did not get any posting error as such. After three days of posting the observation started that previously it was 0L for all reports like F.01 and FAGLB03. Now system started showing error while report run.

 

Finally we deactivated FM and all entry previously done is ok in the report. The three day posting is unable to be seen in the report F.01 and FAGLB03.

 

How to correct the three days entry in the live system from ledger F1 to 0L. Please guide us. Or OSS support is only option for this.

 

Thanks & Regards

Amit

↧

FM Derivations

November 25, 2015, 3:23 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

(a) The business scenario includes, the Fund value to entered in Funds Center Master Data.


Default Fund field ( FINCODE) is been used in the Fund Center Master data for the same.

 

Also the Derivation rule contains as -  Assignment (Fund as CONSTANT with NOT_RELEVA, when FUND is blank) and Don't over-right if the value is present.

 

Unfortunately, all documents are being posted fund as "NOT_RELEVA" inspite the default Fund is maintained in Fund Center Master Data.

 

 

(b) Please guide me the  the logic in Derivation Rule for below business scenario

 

" Derive the Funds center from the ‘Responsible Cost Center’ field that is in the WBS Master for posting in FM instead of Cost Center entered in the transaction"

 

(c) If any statistical internal order input given at transaction level, the system should pick all FM derivaitons as "NOT RELEVANT"

 

 

Kindly suggest the logic, how to build in FMDERIVE to meet the above requirements.

 

Regards

 

Anil

↧
↧

FM integration with HCM

November 27, 2015, 12:45 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

I want to integrate Funds Management and HCM. I would like HCM to capture FM account assignments Funds Centre, Fund, Functional area, Funded program and Commitment item when posting financial transactions. Funds Centre and Commitment will be derived from Cost centre and GL respectively. How about fund, functional area and funded program? I have tried adding these fields in HCM but they are not showing.

 

Kindly assist on how i go about this?

 

Regards

 

Jordan

↧

Supplements are not refreshing the aviable budget.

November 30, 2015, 4:46 pm
$
0
0

Hi again

 

I would like to know, if I need to to a liberation process or something like that, because when I make a supplement, it is shown in my report FMRP_RW_BUDGET in the supplements column, but when I try do to a document, is says that I have no enough budget. So I execute the report FMRP_RW_BUDCON and then, I see in the last column (Actual budget) the amount but it is not updating the column "Available amount", so that is why in my postings appears this error.

 

Can you help me understand this? Or what should I do to put the supplement amount in the avilable amount so I can use it?

 

Thanks in advance.

budget01.jpg

↧

FM Derivation-> Funded Program from WBS element

December 1, 2015, 5:33 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts

 

Greetings!!!

 

We are in realization phase of an implementation project. The business requirement includes the derivation of Funded Program from WBS element

 

- Both Funded program and WBS elements are one to one & master data will be maintained in the systems

 

- WBS element number logic is given below    

  

   XX.1000

    XX.1000.10

     XX.1000.10.01

     XX.1000.10.02

 

I have developed an assignment rule with Source as " WBS Element" and Target field as " Measure - Funded Program"

 

The derivation rules are designed 3 levels with below logic

 

- 1st line -> source field character position from 17/18 digit with 6 / 7 digits  (as WBS element total length is 24 digits)

- 2nd line -> source field character position from 14/16 digit with 8 /10 digits etc

 

Unfortunately i didn't get success and the system is not deriving the same

 

Also i tried to use the function module " FMDT_CONVERTION_WBS_EXT_TO_INT and FMDT_CONVERTION_WBS_INT_TO_EXT.

 

Also i tried to use the function module FMDT_READ_MD_WBS_ELEMENT Read WBS Element Master Data -> maintained Funded Program against WBS element.

 

In all attempts, i am not able to get the result.

 

Kindly suggest, is there any way to meet the business requirement except maintaining the Funded Program in WBS Master data.

 

Kindly revert

 

Regards

 

Anil

↧
Viewing all 860 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>