Hi
FM BCS
module is configured in our SAP ERP system, FM area currency is USD, Budget
control is carried out in FM Area currency (USD).
Requirement is to have budget control on local currency that is INR starting from the certain date.
Is it possible to move to budget control in FM BCS not in USD (group currency), but in INR (local currency) ?
FM Documents are posted from 2008 year.
Thanks in Advance
SAM..
Hi. This is the first time I post. So far I've been what is known as a leech and today it gets worse: I will ask you guys a question. Seriously speaking, many of your discussion have helped me solve problems I had. So, this is my first time to ask for help and start to collaborate. Here is the problem:
The client I work for has updated the Kernel to version 722 patch 4, leaving EA-PS with patch level 15 as shown below.
EA-PS | 600 | 15 | 27 | SAPKGPPD15 | SAP R/3 Enterprise Public Services |
After the updateof the Kernel the system started to behave differentely in the following ways:
It is very likely I'm missing something. But in case they have the incorrect profile, then the system before the upgrade was not "enforcing" customizing. If there is no way to go back to the previous system state, what is the impact of changing the update profile? I've never changed this in the middle of a project before and I have no experience with kernely upgrades.
All help is appreciated. Thanks in advance,
Gonzalo
Hi Expert,
I am using PSCD. We are using only contract account, but no contract object in our solution.
But I didn't find the Account Determination ID in the contract account master data.
I didn't Account Determination ID in table FKKVKP.
Could you please inform how add account determination id in the contract account master data?
Thanks & Regards,
Rupam Paul
Dear colleagues,
We are about to start the configuration in order to activate FM and I am not sure about the impacts in the configuration item: Public Sector Management => Funds Management Government => Basic Settings => Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM).
1) As per SAP documentation, I understand that “Adjust ledger” checkbox must be checked, as no changes in Financial are desirable. Could someone please, advise? As I have not seem this check before in former clients nor in my benchmarking assessments, I assume the scenario could cause it. Some technical details can clarify: the current version for SAP-APPL is 606/0014 and EA-PS is 606/0007/SAPK-60607INEAPS. Financial New GL is not active.
2) Additionally, table T881 for leading ledger 0L shows FAGLFLEXT as total table. Could this cause future issues?
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards,
Adriana
Hi expert,
I am working on PEP, PEP allocate positions based on the assignments stored in /PBFBI/HRPAO01, I want to know when launch PEP from form, what components will be triggerred in SAP BW, where /PBFBI/HRPAO01 will be used to allocate positions? so I want a clear line of relationship from pep form and /PBFBI/HRPAO01.
Many Thanks,
Hi expert,
I am working on PEP, there are a lot sap standard form as follows, can you please tell me how to find the link between those forms and back end objects in BW ? I am not on VC form side, so where I can find corresponding BW objects in SAP documentation?
| FORM1000_PositionMaintenanceForm |
| FORM1100_EmployeeMaintenanceForm |
| FORM1200_PayLevelMaintenanceForm |
| FORM1300_JobMaintenanceForm |
| FORM1400_BenefitRatesMaintenanceForm |
| FORM1500_BenefitRulesMaintenanceForm |
| FORM1600_ProjectionDistributionForm |
| FORM1700_MasterDataComparisonForm |
Many Thanks,
I work for the Public sector who has not activated Prompt Payment Act (PPA) in SAP. But, would like to use the Invoice receipt date (REINDAT) field for posting/Parking FI & MM invoices. Please suggest how can I make this field available at the time of invoicing. Please list out the steps which you have taken in your organisation to enable entry and display of this field.
Thanks.
Hi,
I am observing some difference in budcon consumption report and its line for selected items. (double clicking consumption amount)
Already executed FMAVCREINIT - Re-Initialize AVC Ledger
Still difference is there. what could be the reason
Lincy
Hello,
In the year end process, I am unable to understand the difference between FMJ0 & FMJ2 and when the same have to be used.
Regards
Hi:
where in the configuration I can create new layout and use in FMBB. pls
Hi Experts,
We are planning to implement Grants Management. I would like to know how to integrate MM with GM? Specifically, when we create a PO, what is the best business practice to derive the grant elements? One of the thought process is to input the Grant # alone in the account assignment tab of PO and then derive the other GM elements from that. The problem with this approach is that how to derive the sponsored program, sponsored class and Fund from it (since there are many of them).Another approach is to use minimal elements from Grant, like Grant # and sponsored class (G/L account in PO) and derive values like sponsored program and Fund. Also derive other FM data like Fund center, commitment item etc. Is this the right way to go or grant should be derived from other elements? Please provide your valuable inputs and experiences.
Regards
Suresh
Dear All,
Issue:-
When we try to clear payment through FPRL_LIST if payment doesn't go through (for e.g. wrong vendor bank account maintained, link between house bank and vendor bank didn't go through) but our Original FM document (created in background) is getting reduced although the payment was not successful, now when the user tries to repay (i.e. clear through FPRL_LIST) he gets a Budget Exceeded Error in the log report.
Every time such scenario occurs we have to get a firefighter access and do a FM reconstruction in-order to reverse the reduction and remove the entries from FMIOI table.
Is there some OSS or a way out to avoid such situation again and again.
Regards,
Rg
Dear experts,
We are having grants with cost sharing rules (e.g. External fund 80%, Internal fund 20%). In our derivation, GM objects are derived from internal order. And we have maintained the rule-based account assignment distribution. When we create PO and assign the internal order in the account assignment. System is able derive both external and internal fund. Thus both external and internal funds can be consumed according to the cost sharing percentage.
But if the document posted directly in FI, system can only consuming one fund derived in the derivation rule. How can we make the system to consume both external and internal fund for direct FI posting? Or anyone can share how you manage cost sharing scenario for direct FI postings?
Regards,
Wenxiang
Dear Experts,
We are near to go live on our project and want to know the strategy for FM-BCS balances upload. The following balances will be upload:
1. Initial Stock Upload (MM): In our scenario, we are using Warehouse concept 3 Posting Example Warehouse Concept 3 - Funds Management (FI-FM) - SAP Library,where initially at the time of Goods Receipt (MB1C), the budget of Procurement Dept. will be consumed and on issuance the same will be restored and the budget of requesting CC & FC will be consumed.
2. Asset Upload (FI-AA): We are following two approaches for Asset Master upload, number one is to upload the Asset class wise balance for assets purchased on or before 30-Jun-2015 and number two is to upload the Asset class wise balances for Assets purchased after 30-Jun-2015. In both approaches 30-Sep-2015 is the cut-over date.
3. Receivables (FI-AR), Payable (FI-AP), Other Liabilities, Other Assets, Bank and Equity Balances Upload: Those will be uploaded using F-02.
Considering the above 3 different scenarios, kindly suggest the strategy and precautions to follow for ensuring smooth uploading of balances for Go-Live and making sure the same does not create any issue in Post Go-Live activities on Production Server.
Regards,
Amar Lal
Dear All,
I have a problem regarding fund management, Sap not generate or stop to user for excess budget consumption during Purchase order and Purchase requisition, and this situation come in face from last one and two week ago, before this all are working fine, for your reference we are using former budgeting on fund center base, this situation coming in some fund centers only others are working fine.....I have read all threat regarding this but not solving our purpose please guide me why this happen or how i can re-activate this......
Thanks
Anurag
Hi Experts.
We have executed one program to add wbs in KSV1 cycle to execute wbs to wbs cycle.. We maintained fund centre setting in FMDERIVER. we exeucted cycle in KSV5 and received the error like Fund centre not derived.
We initiated Trace in FMDERIVE and found that WBS is not getting picked up in trace due to which fund centre is not getting picked up.
Why is it happening like this.
Second thing we inserted fund centre in commitment item for time being to execute the cyce and it was posted successfully. Upon checking FI documents it was found that only amount was credited with business area and wbs was not reflecting.
Why system is behaving like this. Please guide.
Regards
Zunaid.
Hi,
We are reaching you with reference to an error " Open Amount exceeded" during goods issue against material reservation.
System reserves funds along with material reservation, but the issue is system reserves fund with material cost at the time of material reservation which could be different from material cost at the time of goods issue which is the root cause of the error.
In most of the cases, if user update requirement date in material reservation, system updates fund reservation with current price which eliminates error. But it is observed that system does not update cost in fund reservation.
Background
----------------
This is a process from Insurance Company, which stocks items for internal usage. Example- Diary, Pen, books etc. Now, when any department needs any item, it makes reservation of the items and a Budget Reservation takes place on that date. If the Departmentment/Cost Center has the budget, the item is booked. However the Goods issue happens on a later date.
Now during goods issue, the price of the item changes due to Moving Average price. Due to this change the Budget check blocks the goods issue with Error message: Open Amount Exceeded" This error comes even if budget is available for the cost center.
Now, we are unable to understand how to bypass this error message and do goods issue.
Hi Experts,
One of my client have BO implemented which takes budget related data from table "FMBL". It was found that their SAP ERP report and BO is not reconciling.
Upon analysis it was identified that they used T-Code "FMPLCPD" to create budget planning data in version "XX". Once their planned data was approved, they used the same T-Code to enter their final figures in version 0. The table used behind FMPLCPD is "FMBDT". During sometime period, they made adjustment within the Fund Centers and Commitment Item using T-Code "FMBB" which updates the table "FMBL". This is the reason that their figures are not matching.
In order to resolve this issue, I have suggested the following:
1 - Using T-Code: FMCYLOAD, generated budget data from that entered in FMPLCPD for version "0" in update mode "0 - Reset and overwrite" with the correct budget type for process "Enter". This will update table "FMBL" from which the budget figures are being sent to BO.
2 - Using T-Code: FMPLCPD, make the amounts equal to "0" of the budget address (i.e. Fund + Fund Center + Commitment Item) so that the amounts are not duplicated.
I require your advice whether it is the correct way to get the issue resolved or is there any other process.
Looking forward to your expert advice!
Regards,
Anss
We are facing few issues with Budget Check during Goods Issue in MIGO.
Error Message:
“Open amount from document XXXXX 001 exceeded by .61%”
Background:
We create Material Reservation on XXXX date for an item in Store. System creates Budget Reservation on the same date with respect to the Budget available and calculating the price of the item on that date. This item is maintained with Moving Average price which keeps changing with change in Material price. Hence, the material price at the time of goods issue changes.
Even though the Budget on Goods Issue date is available or is less than .0123 BBD (Barbadian Dollar), which occurs due to price difference of the item, the system throws error message.
“Open amount from document XXXXX 001 exceeded by .61%”.
System calculates the price differences between Budget Reservation and the Material Price as on Goods Issue Date and checks upto 1/100000 decimal differences. In general any decimal value should be rounded off and Budget should not block the Goods issue due to differences in Decimal.
Work around Solutions:
1. Increase the Budget in T Code FMBB by .0123 BBD and try posting the MIGO.
Result: Still system throws the same error message.
2. Change the Unit Quantity of the item to 100, 1000, 10000 in Material Master in order to remove the differences on decimal as a result clearing the budget check.
Result: We are able to resolve only 50% of the issues with similar error.
3. If the Error is still not resolving even after changing the Unit Quantity of the Items in Material Master, then we are changing the Goods Reservation date in MB21 to the Goods Issue date.
Result: 99% of the errors are getting resolved. However, there is still 1% of issues remaining unresolved.
4. Now inorder to resolve the final 1% of the issues, we change the Material Reservation Date in MB22 to previous date of Goods Issue and then change it back to Goods Issue date. After this we try posting Goods Issue in MIGO, the system accepts and posts the document.
The above solutions are temporary and not resolving the problem completely. Also, these steps have lot of manual intervention which should be automatically done by SAP instead.
Questions:
Major Issue:
If we can resolve the above 2 problems, that will stop the issue permanently.
Please suggest how can we rectify the above issues.
Dear FM Gurus,
Currently, I am implementing SAP Simple Finance with HANA and my system have integration with SAP Fund Management EA-PS 600 SP Level 0026, and for integration between FM and Other modules, i have to do a configuration like this one below:
after that configuration, i try to do some FI Posting transaction such as F-02, FB60 or FB70 but the system proceed some error message runtime error like this:
After do some research in this forum i find Snote number 2038383 - J_1IHBKD: The database view "BSIK" is write protected, so it cannot be changed. this note give a solution to apply some code for correction, but turn out this solution has already done in my system, as shown below:
After consulting with my ABAP team the problem is the system always update to BSIK table, whereas in HANA, bsik is not transparent table but ddl sql view like shown below:
My question is did i missed something?
Thanks in advance
Angga