Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 860 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Fund and Fund center auto update in Asset master data?

July 7, 2015, 4:08 am
$
0
0

hello Experts,

 

We have made derivation rule using asset class, cost center & posting date as source fields as required to fulfill client's requirement. While creating asset master data, fund & fund center is not auto populated when cost center is entered. This is because we have not yet given posting date but when acquisition is made for that asset then asset master data should be populated with fund and fund center. I have run the scenario but asset master data is not updated. Is there any check to activate for this? or I have to manually update asset master data?

 

Please guide me in this matter.

 

 

Regards,

Atif

↧
Search

Cacellation of GR

July 8, 2015, 10:22 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

We have posted one GRN entry which is posted correctly.Now while cancelling the GRN the below Error is giving.

 

Posting not possible; incorrect financial transactions of the cmmt item Message no. FI149

 

Diagnosis

 

You want to post a goods receipt. However, this is not possible because

commitment items that have a financial transaction larger than 40 are

included in the posting.

 

Procedure

 

See to it that your system administrator or consultants check the

commitment item assignments to the G/L accounts.

If you want to post a goods receipt, the only G/L accounts that can be

included are those with a financial transaction smaller than or equal to

40.

 

 

after analysis it is observed that while cancelling the GRN there is a difference of value of the material which the system trying to post to the consumption G/L which is assigned with a commitment item  for which the financial transaction is -30.But as per the procedure given above the financial transaction is below 40 only.so why system is not posting.

 

But when we assign a commitment item for which the financial transaction is 40 to the consumption G/L then it is allowing to post.

 

But for posting to the consumption G/L we have to assign the commitment item  for which the financial transaction is -30 because budget is considered for this G/L


Please advice how to proceed in this scenario.


Regards,

Shivaji

↧
↧

Budget consumption on Invoice before budget carry forward.

July 9, 2015, 1:01 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

We have Budget Carryforward functionality. Budget was carry forwarded on 01.07.2015. Before that few invoice were posted for PO of 2014. System consumed 2015 budget for invoice posted. This is correct system behaviour.

 

Now client was assuming that even if Invoice were posted before budget carry forward, but budget in invoice should be released and adjusted to carry forward budget which is done. This is incorrect.

 

Now below is the problem -

 

There is a huge amount of budget consumed from current year. How to resolve this. One approach is to reverse Invoices and do carry forward again. but reversing invoice is not possible as payment is done.

 

Is there any way we can transfer carry forward budget to existing budget or any work around.

 

Please guide.

 

Regards

Zunaid

↧

Annual budget exceeded

July 9, 2015, 4:36 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

     I have configured FM for my client, after completing we Have allotted budget for the combination fund centre and Commitment for  what i ve created in FMBB. while doing a first posting in F-02 i am facing this error.

 

"

Annual budget exceeded by 1,000.00 INR (FM PB Availability Control) for document item 00001

Message no. FMAVC005

Diagnosis

The annual budget is exceeded by 1,000.00 INR (FM PB Availability Control) for the document item 00001. Budget control on outgoing amounts ( ceiling typeExpenditures) raised this message for the following combination of availability control ledger, fiscal year (and if applicable, year of cash effectivity) and control object:

9H/2015/DUMMYCENTER/TESTCOMMITMENT"


   I did all the possibilities of solving this error but left hopeless. Pls help me to solve this error. I tried  FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct the tables then i even executed T.Code  FMAVCR01 but still i am struck. Do i need to change the config anywere, which  might Configured worng ?



↧

FMCAPFBI Transaction

July 9, 2015, 9:37 am
$
0
0

I am new to the SAP environment.  Recently we initializaed over 30 datasources for our BW enviroment.  We are having problems with transaction FMCAPFBI for the forms delta update.  We had to split some initializations by form type and form bundle number because of volume.  We did full loads with ranges and then an initialization with no data transfer.  The one we did this with are having the problem with the transaction.  It does not seem to recognize the initialization and loading all causing a problem.  Has anybody used this transaction?  Is there a write-up somwhere for this transaction?

Thanks for your help in advance.

↧
↧

No open items to be carried forward found Message no. FMCF200

July 11, 2015, 3:12 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

Under FM-BCS, I am trying to carry forward the commitments through FMJ2 but upon execution system gives the following message:

"No open items to be carried forward found Message no. FMCF200".

I should mention that there are few open commitments in previous year like POs for which no GRN is done.

When I clicked Help->Application Help button on top, system generated a new window message as:

Report.png

The Note at start surprised me as it indicates FMJ2 is for former budgeting only.

I need guidance as whether I am using correct tcode for BCS, and if yes, what should I do to successfully execute the process (carry forward the commitments). If I am using wrong tcode then which one is right to use.

 

Looking for helpful suggestion.

 

Regards

 

Muhammad Waseem

↧

Budget check for Material Reservation from PM Orders

June 24, 2015, 12:52 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are planning to implement budget check at Material Reservation stage. we are upgrading from 600 to 607.

 

What I understand from SAP Note :1321375 is that Program RFFMRP_MAT_RESERVATION will create Earmarked document after PM Order is created. We want to check reservation before PM order is created. if Budget is not there, reservation and PM Order should not be created.

 

Please advise

 

Lincy

↧

Wrong commitment item while posting GR

July 14, 2015, 11:49 pm
$
0
0

Dear all,

We have created a PO with account assignment category-K and assigned a expenses G/L to it.While doing GRN entry the system is posting the document with the commitment item of the expenses G/L in the GR/IR clearing G/L.

 

for example

in the expenses G/L commitment item is 9000-30/3

In the GR/IR G/L commitment item is 4000 - 40/3

 

In both the cases commitment item is derived from the G/L master.

 

The document is posted as

 

Expenses G/L Dr. with commitment item-9000

GR/IR Cr. with commitment item - 9000 also.

we are not able to identify why system is behaving like this.

 

Regards,

Shivaji

↧
Search

Problem with PSM-FM and New/GL with "Document Splitting" active using the Zero-Balance

July 15, 2015, 1:09 pm
$
0
0

Hello everyone.

 

We are working with PSM-FM and New/GL with "Document Splitting" active using the Zero-Balance option active, with the characteristics shown on the screen below.

Sem título.png

Below are the Zero-Balance option settings.

Sem título.png

However, when posting a payment clearing document, zero-balance does not occur, as can be seen in the screenshot below:

Sem título.png

However, if we configure the characteristics shown on the screen below, Zero-Balance occurs correctly:

Sem título.png

Sem título.png

The KNBELNR and VOBELNR characteristics that are necessary for the PSM-FM, are causing problems with "Document Splitting" and Zero-Balance.

 

We appreciate any help because this problem is causing disorders in our accounting.

 

Thanks.


Augusto Sabino

↧
↧

How to set up Deferred Inflows/ outflows G/L account for Public sector in SAP

July 16, 2015, 12:07 pm
$
0
0

We are a government agency required to maintain new accout types & G/L accounts for deferred inflows & outflows in SAP for State reporting purposes as per GASB.

Can someone elaborately explain how this can be acheived in SAP. We know that they need to be created as Balance Sheet accounts. But, please let us know if you had created these G/L accounts in your organisation and list all steps that you carried on for creation of these G/L Accounts.

↧

Constituent Services for Public Sector

July 17, 2015, 2:22 am
$
0
0

HI,

 

I am going to start working on Business Package for e-Government Constituent Services but so far i have not been able to find any config document or building blocks for the same... please if any one can point me in right direction it would greatly help me.

 

 

guidance is of experts is much needed so that i can move ahead with this.

 

 

↧

FMKFDEF - Key Figure With Values Only Of Current Document in FMBB

July 17, 2015, 8:33 am
$
0
0

Hello Colleagues,

 

 

For a specific scenario I need to validate the posted available budget against the current prepost document, is there a way to create

a key figure to collect only the input values for the current document in FMBB ?

 

I've tried to activate the filter in BCS for preposted too, but in this way SAP is checking against all budget, posted and preposted,

I would need the validation only against the inputed prepost value against posted available budget.

 

 

Thanks in advance.

Filipe Santos.

↧

SAP FM commitment item update during Inventory MIGO for PRD GL

July 19, 2015, 4:30 pm
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

We have implemented the ECC6.0 version of PSM, our material pricing strategy is Moving average price. I would like to get some help with regards to how commitment item update should be done during MIGO posting when there is a price difference from PO

 

Example Scenario:

 

Let the Inventory GL = 111000

GRIR GL = 222000

Expense (Price Difference) GL thats assigned to PRD in OBYC = 555000

 

Let the PO price = $100; when we do a GR for $110 (we do this by doing an inventory mark up)

 

Accounting document

 

DR - 111000 - 110

CR - 222000 - 100

CR - 555000 - 10

 

Corresponding FM document

 

Amount Type     GL account     Commitment Item     Amount    

0100                     111000               111000                    100.00

0200                     111000               111000                    -100.00

 

0100                    555000                555000                    10.00

0200                    555000                555000                    -10.00

 

However, we see that the documents before a couple of stack upgrades had the below shown behavior. The client wants this to be the behavior and would like to get it back

 

Amount Type     GL account     Commitment Item     Amount    

0100                     111000               111000                    100.00

0200                     111000               111000                    -100.00

 

0100                    555000                111000                     10.00

0200                    555000                555000                    -10.00

 

We have the commitment item category for both 111000 and 555000 assigned as 30

 

Do anyone know how to control this behavior, if its a customizable setting or OSS note?

 

Thanks for your help in advance

 

Shilpa

↧
↧

FM split account document

July 21, 2015, 8:19 am
$
0
0

Hi folks,

 

I'm working in a FM implementation and the client has the following scenario:

 

Create a Requisition > Purchase Order > MIGO > MIRO using the Fund "A", but, sometimes, they just realize after creating the MIRO that the Fund should be a different one (and sometimes, more than one Fund).

 

So, do you know if it's possible to make a reclassification only in FM to change the Fund or split in more than one Funds?

 

I'm checking the customizing for the Rule-Based Account Assignment, but I didn't have success yet.

 

Thanks a lot and Best Regards,

 

Pedro B. Gomes

↧

FMBB documents created through BAPI are not passing through FMCUDERIVSUB derivation

July 2, 2015, 12:36 am
$
0
0

Dear experts,

 

we are having a "z" transaction from which we create FMBB documents by using BAPI_0050_CREATE.

 

However, those FMBB estandar documents that are created are not having the correct final Funds Center and Commitment Ítem because the BAPI is not going to FMCUDERIVSUB. FMCUDERIVSUB is aimed to derive and substitute the Funds Center and Commitment Ítem values (if they are derived to different values in that fmcuderivsub derivation) in FMBB documents.

 

Could you please help in what should we do to get that derivation through BAPI? Maybe we should use another BAPI, maybe we should send a specific values to that BAPI through specific fields...

 

Thank you very much.

 

Best regads,

Mercedes.

↧
Search

Fund and Fund center auto update in Asset master data?

July 7, 2015, 4:08 am
$
0
0

hello Experts,

 

We have made derivation rule using asset class, cost center & posting date as source fields as required to fulfill client's requirement. While creating asset master data, fund & fund center is not auto populated when cost center is entered. This is because we have not yet given posting date but when acquisition is made for that asset then asset master data should be populated with fund and fund center. I have run the scenario but asset master data is not updated. Is there any check to activate for this? or I have to manually update asset master data?

 

Please guide me in this matter.

 

 

Regards,

Atif

↧

FMWA - Message no. RE145

July 23, 2015, 7:03 am
$
0
0

We are executing transaction FMWA and when we inform WBS Element give a message:

Cost element (G/L account) required with CO account assignment

Message no. RE145

 

In the FM area the Integration with PS/CO is not active.

↧
↧

Forms processing and initialization

July 23, 2015, 7:54 am
$
0
0

I am a novice in the BI/BW area and need some experts to help us.  Contactors setup the entire system and left before it was started in Production.  We are initializing the data sources , but was confronted with the problem of time to do this process.  We changed our infopackages to have ranges by form bundle number, so that we could run this process to go from days to hours per package.  We ran them as full loads and then an initiialize with no transfer.  The problem lies in that we were informed that a transaction, FMCAPFBI, needs to run to establish a delta queue.  It works for all the forms that did not have a range/split but the split forms did not get a delta date and tried to load all.  First, does anyone have experience with this transaction?

Second, where is this delta data stored?  We think it is in DFMCA_FPF_BI.  We need help from the experience Public Sector community and extractors

↧

BRF+ or BaDI

July 26, 2015, 10:07 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

Can you please help me to identify which strategy is appropriate for item determination (Entitlement Determination) in social service plan (SSP)? Is it BaDI  implementation or BRF+ rule function? Help me to identify the pros and cons.Thanks in advance.

↧

FM budget consumption in different dates - Value type 54

July 28, 2015, 9:05 pm
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

We are implementing FM in a client that has the following purchasing scenario for big equipments:

 

1) They create a purchase order with the Invoicing Plan tool that commits the budget, correctly, per date as below:

 

  • 10% in the first month - $100 on 01.08.2015
  • 20% after finish the plans - $200 on 15.08.2015
  • 40% when deliver the equipment - $400 on 01.12.2015
  • 10% 1 year after the delivery - $100 on 01.12.2016
  • 10% 2 year after the delivery - $100 on 01.12.2017
  • 10% 3 year after the delivery - $100 on 01.12.2018

 

However, we receive only one MIRO consuming all the budget in one moment (when the equipment arrives).

 

Do you have any suggestion to make the budget consumption in different dates even if we have only one MIRO?

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Best Regards,

 

Pedro B. Gomes

↧
Viewing all 860 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>